How can that be true of the main cancer treatment
in the U.S.? Fact is, no solid
scientific studies or clinical trials prove chemotherapy's effectiveness, except in a small percentage of very rare types of cancer. For solid tumors of adults, the vast majority of cancer, or anything that has metastasized,
chemotherapy just doesn't work.
A German epidemiologist from
the Heidelberg/Mannheim Tumor Clinic, Dr. Ulrich Abel has done a comprehensive review and analysis of every major
study and clinical trial of chemotherapy ever done. His conclusions should be read by anyone who is about to embark on the Chemo Express.
To make sure he had reviewed
everything ever published on chemotherapy,
Abel sent letters to over 350 medical centers around the world asking
them to send him anything they had published on the subject. Abel researched
thousands of articles: it is unlikely that anyone in the world knows more about chemotherapy than he.
The analysis took him several
years, but the results are astounding:
Abel found that the overall worldwide
success rate of chemotherapy was "appalling"
because there was simply no scientific evidence available anywhere that chemotherapy can
"extend in any appreciable way the lives of patients suffering from the most common organic cancers."
Abel emphasizes that chemotherapy rarely can improve the quality of life. He describes chemotherapy as "a scientific wasteland" and states that at least 80 percent of chemotherapy administered throughout the world is worthless, and is akin to the "emperor's new clothes"
- neither doctor nor patient is willing to give up on chemotherapy even though there is no scientific evidence
that it works! -
Lancet 10 Aug 91
No mainstream media even mentioned this
comprehensive study: it was totally buried.
In an especially dramatic table, Dr. Abel displays the results of chemotherapy
in patients with various types of cancers, as the improvement of survival rates,
compared to untreated patients. This table shows:
Read complete Report here
* Colorectal cancer: no evidence survival is improved.
* Gastric cancer: no clear evidence.
* Pancreatic cancer: Study completely negative. Longer survival in control
* Bladder cancer:
no clinical trial done.
* Breast cancer: No direct evidence that chemotherapy prolongs survival;
its use is "ethically questionable." (That is particularly newsworthy, since all breast cancer patients,
before or after surgery, are given chemotherapy drugs.)
* Ovarian cancer: no direct evidence.
* Cervix and uterus: No improved survival.
* Head and neck: no survival benefit but occasional shrinkage of tumors.
They both destroy White Blood
This destruction of WHITE BLOOD CELLS is very much like what happens to HIV patients who are initially diagnosed as being
HIV positive. Over time, the HIV
virus destroys CD4 cells (Look at Hypothetical Example below) which are WHITE BLOOD CELLS called "Helper
Cells". These CD4 white blood cells are our first line of defense
against any foreign invader and protect us from many different types of diseases and ailments like pneumonia, the
common cold, the flu and on and on and on.
You will notice in the HYPOTHETICAL
EXAMPLE below, that when an
HIV patient's CD4 count reaches
200, the patient is diagnosed as having AIDS. It is at this point when a person can become vulnerable
to over 30 different types of diseases. Their
immune system no longer has the ability to fight off these diseases that normally would not cause them any problem.
Healthy adults usually have CD4
1000 or more per cubic millimeter of blood
|*AIDS is diagnosed when the CD4 cell count
drops below 200 cells per cubic millimeter of blood.
*This is why Doctors have to keep an eye
on each Chemotherapy Patient's White Blood Count because they know that if they keep giving the patient Chemotherapy they will eventually create the same condition that AIDS Patients die from.
After reading this information, one quickly realizes when Chemotherapy kills your White
Blood Cells it is a Step by Step destruction of an already compromised immune system, one White Blood Cell at a
time. Did you know that studies
have been done that indicate that over
60% of Cancer patients, who
take Chemotherapy, die from opportunistic illnesses like pneumonia, the common cold, etc. instead of the Cancer
intself. Why? They have no immune
system left to fight anything.
Red Blood Cells are your oxygen carriers. At the following link, you will find a section that discusses ACIDOSIS and
10 reasons you must avoide it.
This section explains how important it is to have a balanced PH. Did you know that once a Cancer Patient begins
Chemo and Radiation treatments all Cancer patients have 2 things in common irregardless of the type of Cancer they
have? They will become highly
acidic and anemic which can lead to a myriad of health problems. Acid drives out Oxygen and creates an anaerobic atmosphere that Cancer & other
degenerative diseases love and thrive in.
The reason, many Cancer patients are Anemic, is because Acid drives out the Oxygen found in a Red Blood Cell. As that Red Blood Cell(full of Oxygen)
travels from the Heart to the rest of the body, the amount of Oxygen in that Red Blood Cell can be diminished depending on the Acid atmosphere it
is traveling through. Did you
know that advanced Cancer Patients
are usually 1000 times more acidic than a healthy human being?
This low oxygen atmosphere is the perfect breeding ground for Cancer and may be the very reason why advanced Cancer
Patients rarely recover. In the
presence of this toxic Acid Atmosphere, Tumors and Cancer cells continue to multiply out of control. The greater
the tumor mass becomes or the greater the cancer cell volume in the body becomes, each Cancer Patient is put at
higher risk of developing a life threatening condition called Cachexia.
It is estimated that Cancer Cells
have a METABOLISM that is 8 times
greater than the metabolism of normal cells
which can cause a condition
called Cachexia. This condition causes the Cancer patient to die from Malnutrition because the
cancer cells hoard & consume all of the nutrition in the body while
the healthy cells and the patient starve to death.
So, if a Cancer patient is already
Acidic & if Acid drives out the oxygen causing an anaerobic atmosphere that Cancer loves, how much sense does it make to take Chemotherapy that will kill more of your oxygen
carrying Red Blood Cells? By
a matter of deduction and the use of common sense once again, wouldn't that create an even more anaerobic atmosphere and provide an even more desirable
situation for Cancer to wreak havoc?
|When any chemotherapeutic drug is spilled in
the hospital or anywhere en route, it is classified as a major biohazard, requiring the specialists to come and clean it up with their space-suits and all their
strictly regulated protocols.
Yet this same agent is going to be put into the human body and is expected to cure it of disease?
What's wrong with this picture?
Picture of Chemotherpy Spilled
on a Patients Hand
Above is a reduced-size rendering of the burning and scarring resulting “of a spill of chemotherapy
onto the bare hand. Is it any
wonder that people are worried about what might be happening to their insides as chemotherapy is intravenously
fed into the body? Is it any
wonder that chemotherapy nurses wear protective gloves?
“Several full-time scientists at the McGill Cancer Center sent to 118 doctors, all experts on lung cancer, a questionnaire
to determine the level of trust they had in the therapies they were applying; they were asked to imagine that they
themselves had contracted the disease and which of the six current experimental therapies they would choose. 79
doctors answered, 64 of them
said that they would not consent to undergo any treatment containing cisplatinum – one of the common chemotherapy drugs they used – while 58 out of 79 believed that all the experimental therapies above were not accepted because
of the ineffectiveness and the elevated level of toxicity of chemotherapy.”
(Philip Day, “Cancer: Why we’re still
dying to know the truth”, Credence Publications, 2000)
Is it suspicious that a high
percentage of oncologists
admit they would refuse
the same treatments they recommend
to their patients?
Like the case of Jackie Onassis, who underwent chemo for one of the rare diseases in which it generally has some beneficial results:
non-Hodgkins lymphoma. She went
into the hospital on Friday and was dead by Tuesday.
“The ineffectiveness of chemotherapy and its
unacceptable degree of toxicity.”
Philip Day, Cancer: Why We’re
Still Dying to Know the Truth
Because of the problem of nausea and vomiting
caused by cancer itself as well as many chemotherapy agents and/or radiation therapy, many cancer patients develop anorexia - the loss of appetite or desire to eat. This situation is not good at all because it can lead
to a condition known as cancer "cachexia"
- a wasting syndrome characterized by weakness and a noticeable continuous loss of weight, fat, and muscle.
A high percentage of cancer patients actually die
of malnutrition rather than their disease itself.
Dr. Wynders' Bio
Chemotherapy expert Ernst Wynder, former professor at Sloan-Kettering Hospital and recipient of a medal
from the American Cancer Association,
wrote this warning to professor Gearin-Tosh about advising a close friend to avoid chemotherapy!
Why is there so much use of chemotherapy if it does so little good?
Well for one thing, drug companies provide huge economic incentives. In 1990, $3.53 billion was spent on chemotherapy. By 1994 that figure had more than
doubled to $7.51 billion. This
relentless increase in chemotherapy use was accompanied by a relentless increase in cancer deaths.
return to home page