The 4 Corners Protocol focuses on surrounding and attacking cancer from 4 Corners or from 4 different angles by focusing on:

Killing cancer cells
Regulating Immune System dysfunction
Improving Liver Function/Detoxification
Reversing Acidosis(low oxygen levels)

Poly MVA and the other supplements listed below are necessary to achieve each specific goal. The objective is for Poly MVA(In conjunction with Chemo-or without Chemo) to destroy cancer cells while each cancer patient is eliminating the toxic and polluted atmosphere that is documented to exist in cancer patients bodies.



Vitamin D3
see section below


Liver Support

Coral Calcium "Supreme"


Coenzyme Q-10



"New" Patients Site

Cancer Patient Forum

Alphabetical List of
Cancer Patient Testimonials






















The Potential for Vitamin D in Cancer Treatment

Vitamin D deficiency has clearly been shown to be a risk factor in the development of multiple forms of cancer.
This scientific research indicates that maintaining high levels of vitamin D can prevent the progression of cancer & increase survival rates.


Every Cancer Patient needs to test their Vitamin D levels!

Summary of Findings:

Circulating Vitamin D levels in the Blood
Dramatically Reduces Death Rate

* For each 10ng/ml increase in the blood level of vitamin D, the death rate from cancer would be reduced by 29%. The relationship between vitamin D and colorectal cancer is particularly strong. The death rate for colorectal cancer would be reduced by 49%.
30 - Read Supporting Scientific Article)

Vitamin D Levels
Highest during Summer = Improves survival by 40%

* A Norwegian study showed that cancer patients diagnosed in the summer when vitamin D levels are highest had up to 40% better survival rates than patients diagnosed in the winter when vitamin D levels are at their lowest.
56 - Read Supporting Scientific Article )

Low Vitamin D Levels
Greater chance of Death & Metastasis

* Breast cancer patients with low levels of vitamin D followed over eleven years had a 70% greater chance of dying and twice the rate of developing metastasis than patients with high levels of vitamin D.
90 - Read Supporting Scientific Article )

Lung Cancer Patients
Higher levels = Dramatic increase in Survival

* Early stage lung cancer patients who were diagnosed in the summer and had the highest levels of vitamin D had a five-year survival of 73% compared to 30% for those diagnosed in the winter with low vitamin D levels.
60 - Read Supporting Scientific Article)

Lung - Colon - Prostate - Renal - Endometrial Cancers
Higher Vit D levels dramatically decreases Risk

* High vitamin D levels (based on latitude and UV exposure) also correlate with a decreased risk of developing lung cancer, a 45% and 65% reduction in men and women respectively. Similar effects have been demonstrated in colon, prostate, renal and endometrial cancer.
33 - Read Supporting Scientific Article)

Advanced Colorectal Patients
Risk of death greatly Improved

* The risk of death for colorectal cancer patients with advanced disease but with high levels of vitamin D was reduced by over 60% compared to patients with low vitamin D levels.
64 - Read Supporting Scientific Article)

Prostate Cancer Patients
7 Fold reduced risk of Death

*Prostate Cancer Patients with Vitamin D levels in the mid and high range had a 60% and 85% respectively reduced risk of death from the condition compared to patients with low levels of Vitamin D. This is almost a seven fold increase in the risk of death in those with low vs high vitamin D levels.
152 - Read Supporting Scientific Article)

Ask your Doctor for a
25-Hydroxy Vitamin D Blood Test

*Most Cancer Patients have Vitamin D blood levels

below < 40 ng/ml

Don't Be Fooled -- Order the Correct Test

There are two vitamin D tests -- 1,25(OH)D and 25(OH)D.
The correct test is 25(OH)D, also
called, The 25-hydroxy vitamin D blood test.

25(OH)D is the better marker of overall D status. It is this marker that is most strongly associated with overall health.

Please note the difference between normal and optimal. You don't want to be average here; you want to be optimally healthy. Primitive man likely developed in tropical and sub-tropical conditions with large exposure to UV-B and its secondary consequence to skin exposure, vitamin D.

Primitive environmental availability of a nutrient does not necessarily establish the higher requirements, but these exposures would have influenced the evolution of the relevant physiology, and such concentrations should at least be considered presumptively acceptable.

Some experts may disagree with the following healthy ranges, but they are taken from healthy people in tropical or subtropical parts of the world, where they are receiving healthy sun exposures. It seems more than reasonable to assume that these values are in fact reflective of an optimal human requirement.


Cancer's Favorite Food - Found in Everything You Eat?
Posted By Dr. Mercola | August 27 2010

Check the ingredients of everything you eat or drink!

Nationally Recognized Doctor talks about High Fructose Corn Syrup and

Click below to read important article
"Cancer Patients must avoid Sugars like Fructose"

msnbc Article
Cancer Cells feed on fructose, study finds

Click here to Print Article

Reuters Article
Cancer Cells Slurp up fructose, US study finds

Click here to Print Article


 Conventional Medicine has 3 different approaches to fighting Cancer.

1. Poison- Chemotherapy

2. Burn- Radiation

3. Slash- Surgery

In the 4 Corners Protocol listed above, these three Conventional Treatments would fit in the section DESTROY CANCER CELLS. Cancer Patients for many years have been told that these are their best and only options. Conventional Medicine doesn't even concern itself with the other parts of the 4 Corners Protocol which involves returning a persons IMMUNE SYSTEM FUNCTION back to the level it once functioned before Cancer took over, along with the importance of DETOXIFICATION so that our immune system can return its focus to destroying & eliminating disease instead of dealing with unnecessary waste & toxins that are polluting our bodies. Finally, it has been documented that all cancer patients suffer from ACIDOSIS & therefore have created an anaerobic, low oxygen atmosphere in their bodies that cancer loves. Have you ever heard your Doctor talk about any of these items? Conventional Medicine only deals with the effect which is Cancer.

Shouldn't someone be asking the question,
"What caused my cancer?" or "Why have cancer rates gone from 3 people out of 100 back in 1900 to 1 out of every 2.5 Americans today?" Most Oncologists won't even consider other measures that should be taken to improve a persons chances of surviving Cancer by changing the toxic atmosphere in the body that has allowed the Cancer to occur in the first place.

The frightening thing is Surveys have been done that document that the
overall mortality rate for Cancer is the same now as it was 30 years ago when President Nixon "Declared War On Cancer".

The following information & comments by world class Scientists and Doctors
explains why Conventional Cancer Treatments have had such dismal results.


Print this information and give it to your Oncologist.
They will know this information is true & will be in NO position to argue with you.



Linus Pauling Ph.D. -
Linus Pauling Bio
2 time Nobel Prize winner


"Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely a fraud and that the major cancer research organisations are derelict in their duties to the people who support them."


Alan C Nixon, PhD
Former president of the American Chemical Society a chemist trained to interpret data, it is incomprehensible to me that physicians can ignore the clear evidence that chemotherapy does much, much more harm than good.


Ralph Moss, PhD,
Former Director of Information for
Sloan Kettering Cancer Research Center

"Chemotherapy is basically ineffective in the vast majority of cases in which it is given, the exceptions being acute lymphocytic leukemia, Hodgkin's disease, nonseminomatous testicular cancer, as well as a few very rare forms of cancer, including choriocarcinoma, Wilm's tumor, and retinoblastoma."


Dr. Jürgen Buche, Preventorium Institute

"...chemotherapy is curative in very few cancers - testicular, Hodgkin's, choriocarcinoma, childhood leukemia. In most common solid tumors - lung, colon, breast, etc. - chemotherapy is NOT curative."


Dr. Martin Shapiro UCLA

"Cancer researchers, medical journals, and the popular media all have contributed to a situation in which many people with common malignancies are being treated with drugs not known to be effective."


Samuel S. Epstein, M.D.

Dr. Epstein Bio
Congressional Record, Sept. 9, 1987

Chemotherapy and radiation can increase the risk of developing a second cancer by up to 100 times, according to Dr. Samuel S. Epstein.


Dr. Candace Pert
Georgetown University School of Medicine

"Except for two forms of cancer, chemotherapy does not cure. It tortures and may shorten life. No one can tell from the available data."


Thomas Dao, MD

New England Journal of Medicine

Mar 1975 292 p 707

"Despite widespread use of chemotherapies, breast
cancer mortality has not changed in the last 70 years."


Oncologist Albert Braverman, MD

1991 Lancet 1991 337 p 901

"Medical Oncology in the 90s"

"no disseminated neoplasm (cancer) incurable in 1975 is curable today."

"Many medical oncologists recommend chemotherapy for virtually any tumor, with a hopefulness undiscouraged by almost invariable failure.
Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy does not eliminate breast, colon, or lung cancers.
This fact has been documented for over a decade, yet doctors still use chemotherapy for these tumors."

Ralph Moss, PhD
Former Director of Information for
Sloan Kettering Cancer Research Center

Question: "How in the world, Dr Moss, can [chemotherapy] be considered a standard cure, when it works for 2-4 [percent of cancer patients], and very specific ones?

Answer: We are dealing with an industry. It is not supported by the facts. The way that it is done is this. The drugs are tested in test tubes, and they look for things that will kill cells. After you have found something that kills cells, cancer cells, cell lines which are very abnormal non-typical sort of growths, maybe a new life form almost, then you put it into animals. Then if it kills the cancers before it kills the animals, and shrinks the tumours, you consider you have an active agent.

You then put it into people, and go through the 3 phases the FDA prescribes for this, and basically if you can shrink the tumour 50% or more for 28 days you have got the FDA's definition of an active drug. That is called a response rate, so you have a response.. Quite a bit [different from a cure] because when you look to see if there is any life prolongation from taking this treatment what you find is all kinds of hocus pocus and song and dance about the disease free survival, and this and that. In the end there is no proof that chemotherapy in the vast majority of cases actually extends life, and this is the GREAT LIE about chemotherapy, that somehow there is a correlation between shrinking a tumour and extending the life of the patient.

[Or that there is a correlation between looking at a cancer cell in a test tube and the tumour in someone's body.]
What happens as you grow those cells in cell lines they become very weird. Hundreds and hundreds of generations later they don't even look like normal human cancer cells. They are things that grow under glass, immortal cells, unlike normal cancer cells. So much cancer research is very questionable because it is based on this cell line research.


How can that be true of the main cancer treatment in the U.S.? Fact is, no solid scientific studies or clinical trials prove chemotherapy's effectiveness, except in a small percentage of very rare types of cancer. For solid tumors of adults, the vast majority of cancer, or anything that has metastasized, chemotherapy just doesn't work.

A German epidemiologist from the Heidelberg/Mannheim Tumor Clinic, Dr. Ulrich Abel has done a comprehensive review and analysis of every major study and clinical trial of chemotherapy ever done. His conclusions should be read by anyone who is about to embark on the Chemo Express.

To make sure he had reviewed everything ever published on chemotherapy,
Abel sent letters to over 350 medical centers around the world asking
them to send him anything they had published on the subject.
Abel researched
thousands of articles: it is unlikely that anyone in the world knows more about chemotherapy than he.

The analysis took him several years, but the results are astounding:
Abel found that the overall worldwide success rate of chemotherapy was "appalling"
because there was simply no scientific evidence available anywhere that chemotherapy can
"extend in any appreciable way the lives of patients suffering from the most common organic cancers."

Abel emphasizes that chemotherapy rarely can improve the quality of life.
He describes chemotherapy as "a scientific wasteland" and states that at least 80 percent of chemotherapy administered throughout the world is worthless, and is akin to the "emperor's new clothes" - neither doctor nor patient is willing to give up on chemotherapy even though there is no scientific evidence that it works! -
Lancet 10 Aug 91

No mainstream media even mentioned this
comprehensive study: it was totally buried.


In an especially dramatic table, Dr. Abel displays the results of chemotherapy
in patients with various types of cancers,
as the improvement of survival rates,
compared to untreated patients. This table shows:

Read complete Report here

Colorectal cancer: no evidence survival is improved.

Gastric cancer: no clear evidence.

Pancreatic cancer: Study completely negative. Longer survival in control (untreated) group.

Bladder cancer: no clinical trial done.

Breast cancer: No direct evidence that chemotherapy prolongs survival; its use is "ethically questionable." (That is particularly newsworthy, since all breast cancer patients, before or after surgery, are given chemotherapy drugs.)

Ovarian cancer: no direct evidence.

Cervix and uterus: No improved survival.

Head and neck: no survival benefit but occasional shrinkage of tumors.


They both destroy White Blood Cells!

This destruction of WHITE BLOOD CELLS is very much like what happens to HIV patients who are initially diagnosed as being HIV positive. Over time, the HIV virus destroys CD4 cells (Look at Hypothetical Example below) which are WHITE BLOOD CELLS called "Helper Cells". These CD4 white blood cells are our first line of defense against any foreign invader and protect us from many different types of diseases and ailments like pneumonia, the common cold, the flu and on and on and on.

You will notice in the
HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE below, that when an HIV patient's CD4 count reaches 200, the patient is diagnosed as having AIDS. It is at this point when a person can become vulnerable to over 30 different types of diseases. Their immune system no longer has the ability to fight off these diseases that normally would not cause them any problem.


Healthy adults usually have CD4 counts of
1000 or more per cubic millimeter of blood














HIV Negative

























*AIDS is diagnosed when the CD4 cell count drops below 200 cells per cubic millimeter of blood.

*This is why Doctors have to keep an eye on each Chemotherapy Patient's White Blood Count because they know that if they keep giving the patient Chemotherapy they will eventually create the same condition that AIDS Patients die from.


After reading this information, one quickly realizes when Chemotherapy kills your White Blood Cells it is a Step by Step destruction of an already compromised immune system, one White Blood Cell at a time. Did you know that studies have been done that indicate that over 60% of Cancer patients, who take Chemotherapy, die from opportunistic illnesses like pneumonia, the common cold, etc. instead of the Cancer intself. Why? They have no immune system left to fight anything.


Red Blood Cells are your oxygen carriers. At the following link, you will find a section that discusses ACIDOSIS and 10 reasons you must avoide it. This section explains how important it is to have a balanced PH. Did you know that once a Cancer Patient begins Chemo and Radiation treatments all Cancer patients have 2 things in common irregardless of the type of Cancer they have? They will become highly acidic and anemic which can lead to a myriad of health problems. Acid drives out Oxygen and creates an anaerobic atmosphere that Cancer & other degenerative diseases love and thrive in.

The reason, many Cancer patients are Anemic, is because
Acid drives out the Oxygen found in a Red Blood Cell. As that Red Blood Cell(full of Oxygen) travels from the Heart to the rest of the body, the amount of Oxygen in that Red Blood Cell can be diminished depending on the Acid atmosphere it is traveling through. Did you know that advanced Cancer Patients are usually 1000 times more acidic than a healthy human being?

This low oxygen atmosphere is the perfect breeding ground for Cancer and may be the very reason why advanced Cancer Patients rarely recover.
In the presence of this toxic Acid Atmosphere, Tumors and Cancer cells continue to multiply out of control. The greater the tumor mass becomes or the greater the cancer cell volume in the body becomes, each Cancer Patient is put at higher risk of developing a life threatening condition called Cachexia.

It is estimated that Cancer Cells have a
METABOLISM that is 8 times greater than the metabolism of normal cells 
which can cause a condition called Cachexia. This condition causes the Cancer patient to die from Malnutrition because the cancer cells hoard & consume all of the nutrition in the body while the healthy cells and the patient starve to death.

So, if a Cancer patient is already Acidic & if Acid drives out the oxygen causing an anaerobic atmosphere that Cancer loves, how much sense does it make to take Chemotherapy that will kill more of your oxygen carrying Red Blood Cells? By a matter of deduction and the use of common sense once again, wouldn't that create an even more anaerobic atmosphere and provide an even more desirable situation for Cancer to wreak havoc?


When any chemotherapeutic drug is spilled in the hospital or anywhere en route, it is classified as a major biohazard, requiring the specialists to come and clean it up with their space-suits and all their strictly regulated protocols.

Yet this same agent is going to be put into the human body and is expected to cure it of disease?


What's wrong with this picture?

Picture of Chemotherpy Spilled on a Patients Hand

Above is a reduced-size rendering of the burning and scarring resulting “of a spill of chemotherapy onto the bare hand. Is it any wonder that people are worried about what might be happening to their insides as chemotherapy is intravenously fed into the body? Is it any wonder that chemotherapy nurses wear protective gloves?


“Several full-time scientists at the McGill Cancer Center sent to 118 doctors, all experts on lung cancer, a questionnaire to determine the level of trust they had in the therapies they were applying; they were asked to imagine that they themselves had contracted the disease and which of the six current experimental therapies they would choose. 79 doctors answered,
64 of them said that they would not consent to undergo any treatment containing cisplatinum – one of the common chemotherapy drugs they used – while 58 out of 79 believed that all the experimental therapies above were not accepted because of the ineffectiveness and the elevated level of toxicity of chemotherapy.”

(Philip Day, “Cancer: Why we’re still dying to know the truth”, Credence Publications, 2000)

Is it suspicious that a high percentage of oncologists admit they would refuse the same treatments they recommend to their patients?

Click Here


Like the case of Jackie Onassis, who underwent chemo for one of the rare diseases in which it generally has some beneficial results: non-Hodgkins lymphoma. She went into the hospital on Friday and was dead by Tuesday.


“The ineffectiveness of chemotherapy and its
unacceptable degree of toxicity.”

Philip Day, Cancer: Why We’re Still Dying to Know the Truth

Because of the problem of nausea and vomiting caused by cancer itself as well as many chemotherapy agents and/or radiation therapy, many cancer patients develop anorexia - the loss of appetite or desire to eat. This situation is not good at all because it can lead to a condition known as cancer "cachexia" - a wasting syndrome characterized by weakness and a noticeable continuous loss of weight, fat, and muscle.

A high percentage of cancer patients actually die
of malnutrition rather than their disease itself.

Dr. Wynders' Bio

Chemotherapy expert Ernst Wynder, former professor at Sloan-Kettering Hospital and recipient of a medal from the American Cancer Association, wrote this warning to professor Gearin-Tosh about advising a close friend to avoid chemotherapy!


”Chemotherapy Report”
Why is there so much use of chemotherapy if it does so little good?

Well for one thing, drug companies provide huge economic incentives.
In 1990, $3.53 billion was spent on chemotherapy. By 1994 that figure had more than doubled to $7.51 billion. This relentless increase in chemotherapy use was accompanied by a relentless increase in cancer deaths.

return to home page



Home - Our Inspiration - Testimonials - Practitioners List - Scientific Research - What you must know

All rights reserved